1985 Ford Mustang vs. 1963 Seat 1500
To start off, 1985 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Ford Mustang (175 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Ford Mustang weights approximately 20 kg more than 1963 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford Mustang | 1963 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Mustang | 1500 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2301 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2660 mm |