1985 Ford Mustang vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1985 Ford Mustang is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Ford Mustang (175 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Ford Mustang weights approximately 406 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Ford Mustang | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Mustang | 102 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 2301 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2160 mm |
