1985 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 285 more horse power than 1985 Ford Mustang. (175 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Ford Mustang (285 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1985 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford Mustang | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2301 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2580 mm |