1985 Ford Mustang vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1985 Ford Mustang. (87 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 595 kg more than 1985 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Ford Mustang. (161 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Ford Mustang. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1985 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1985 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford Mustang | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Mustang | Equinox |
Year Released | 1985 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2294 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 98 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4771 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2857 mm |