1985 Ford RS 200 vs. 1950 Maserati A6GCS
To start off, 1985 Ford RS 200 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Maserati A6GCS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Ford RS 200 (247 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Ford RS 200 weights approximately 556 kg more than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Ford RS 200 | 1950 Maserati A6GCS | |
| Make | Ford | Maserati |
| Model | RS 200 | A6GCS |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1804 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 624 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2320 mm |
