1985 Ford RS 200 vs. 1957 Seat 600
To start off, 1985 Ford RS 200 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1985 Ford RS 200 (247 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1957 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1957 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Ford RS 200 weights approximately 605 kg more than 1957 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Ford RS 200 (293 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1985 Ford RS 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford RS 200 | 1957 Seat 600 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | RS 200 | 600 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 293 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2010 mm |