1985 Ford RS 200 vs. 1962 Holden EK
To start off, 1985 Ford RS 200 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Ford RS 200 (247 HP) has 183 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1985 Ford RS 200 (293 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 1985 Ford RS 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford RS 200 | 1962 Holden EK | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | RS 200 | EK |
Year Released | 1985 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1804 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 293 Nm | 164 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |