1985 Ford RS 200 vs. 1998 Kia Elan
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 1,804 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford RS 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Ford RS 200 (247 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1998 Kia Elan. (151 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1998 Kia Elan.
Because 1985 Ford RS 200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Ford RS 200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Ford RS 200 (293 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 1985 Ford RS 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford RS 200 | 1998 Kia Elan | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | RS 200 | Elan |
Year Released | 1985 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1804 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 151 HP |
Torque | 293 Nm | 186 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2270 mm |