1985 Ford RS 200 vs. 1998 Proton Satria
To start off, 1998 Proton Satria is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 1,833 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Proton Satria is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1985 Ford RS 200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Ford RS 200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Proton Satria, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Ford RS 200 (293 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Proton Satria. (161 Nm). This means 1985 Ford RS 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Proton Satria.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Ford RS 200 | 1998 Proton Satria | |
| Make | Ford | Proton |
| Model | RS 200 | Satria |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1804 cc | 1833 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 293 Nm | 161 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 229 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2450 mm |
