1985 Ford RS 200 vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 1,804 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford RS 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Ford RS 200 weights approximately 470 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Ford RS 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford RS 200 | 2000 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | RS 200 | Minica |
Year Released | 1985 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1804 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2350 mm |