1985 Ford RS 200 vs. 2004 Nissan Avenir
To start off, 2004 Nissan Avenir is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Avenir is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Avenir weights approximately 300 kg more than 1985 Ford RS 200.
Because 2004 Nissan Avenir is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Ford RS 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Avenir will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Nissan Avenir has automatic transmission and 1985 Ford RS 200 has manual transmission. 1985 Ford RS 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Nissan Avenir will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Ford RS 200 | 2004 Nissan Avenir | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | RS 200 | Avenir |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1804 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2630 mm |
