1985 Ford RS 200 vs. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Ford RS 200 (247 HP) has 93 more horse power than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Ford RS 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Ford RS 200. (293 Nm). This means 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Ford RS 200.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford RS 200 | 2011 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Ford | Citroen |
Model | RS 200 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1985 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1804 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 293 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.7 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |