1985 Ford RS 200 vs. 2011 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2011 Holden Cruze is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Ford RS 200 (247 HP) has 86 more horse power than 2011 Holden Cruze. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Cruze.
Because 1985 Ford RS 200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Ford RS 200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Cruze (360 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Ford RS 200. (293 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Ford RS 200.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford RS 200 | 2011 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | RS 200 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1985 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1804 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 293 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2685 mm |