1985 Ford RS 200 vs. 2011 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2011 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Ford RS 200 (247 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2011 Nissan X-Trail. (137 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 1985 Ford RS 200 (293 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan X-Trail. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1985 Ford RS 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford RS 200 | 2011 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | RS 200 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1985 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1804 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 293 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 229 km/hour | 182 km/hour |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 116 L | 65 L |