1985 Ford RS 200 vs. 2012 Audi A6

To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Ford RS 200 (247 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2012 Audi A6. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi A6.

Because 1985 Ford RS 200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Ford RS 200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A6 (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Ford RS 200. (293 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Ford RS 200.

Compare all specifications:

1985 Ford RS 200 2012 Audi A6
Make Ford Audi
Model RS 200 A6
Year Released 1985 2012
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 1804 cc 1968 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 247 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 293 Nm 350 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 1750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4000 mm 4915 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1872 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1453 mm
Wheelbase Size 2520 mm 2911 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 116 L 75 L