1985 Ford Sierra vs. 2000 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2000 Holden Commodore is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Holden Commodore (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1985 Ford Sierra. (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Holden Commodore weights approximately 405 kg more than 1985 Ford Sierra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden Commodore (304 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Ford Sierra. (220 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2000 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Ford Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Ford Sierra | 2000 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Sierra | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2790 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 304 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2950 mm |
