1985 Ford Sierra vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (307 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1985 Ford Sierra. (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 583 kg more than 1985 Ford Sierra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (374 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Ford Sierra. (220 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Ford Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Ford Sierra | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Ford | Cadillac |
| Model | Sierra | CTS |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2790 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 307 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 374 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 85.6 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1788 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2890 mm |
