1985 Ford Sierra vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 408 more horse power than 1985 Ford Sierra. (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 710 kg more than 1985 Ford Sierra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (746 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 526 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Ford Sierra. (220 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Ford Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford Sierra | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | Sierra | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2790 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 556 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 746 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2880 mm |