1985 Ford Telstar vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1985 Ford Telstar. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 172 kg more than 1985 Ford Telstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Ford Telstar (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1985 Ford Telstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford Telstar | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Telstar | 3 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1202 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2650 mm |