1985 Ford Tempo vs. 1982 Renault 11
To start off, 1985 Ford Tempo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 11 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Ford Tempo (90 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1982 Renault 11. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Ford Tempo weights approximately 275 kg more than 1982 Renault 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Ford Tempo | 1982 Renault 11 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Tempo | 11 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1106 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 72 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2490 mm |
