1985 Ford Tempo vs. 1997 Acura EL
To start off, 1997 Acura EL is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura EL (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1985 Ford Tempo. (90 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Ford Tempo weights approximately 26 kg more than 1997 Acura EL.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Acura EL. (145 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1985 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford Tempo | 1997 Acura EL | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Tempo | EL |
Year Released | 1985 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1079 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1704 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2619 mm |