1985 Ford Tempo vs. 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 725 kg more than 1985 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford Tempo | 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Tempo | Challenger |
Year Released | 1985 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2730 mm |