1985 Ford Tempo vs. 2002 Nissan Maxima
To start off, 2002 Nissan Maxima is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Maxima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan Maxima (252 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1985 Ford Tempo. (100 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Maxima should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan Maxima (334 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Nissan Maxima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford Tempo | 2002 Nissan Maxima | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Tempo | Maxima |
Year Released | 1985 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 334 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2760 mm |