1985 Ford Tempo vs. 2003 Mazda 6

To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (164 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1985 Ford Tempo. (90 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1985 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Ford Tempo.

Compare all specifications:

1985 Ford Tempo 2003 Mazda 6
Make Ford Mazda
Model Tempo 6
Year Released 1985 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2307 cc 2261 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 90 HP 164 HP
Engine RPM 4700 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 170 Nm 207 Nm
Torque RPM 2700 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 96 mm 87.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.5 mm 94 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1105 kg 1465 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2540 mm 2630 mm