1985 Ford Tempo vs. 2004 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2004 Mazda B3000 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B3000 (155 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1985 Ford Tempo. (100 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 345 kg more than 1985 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B3000 (244 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Ford Tempo | 2004 Mazda B3000 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Tempo | B3000 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 244 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3200 mm |
