1985 Ford Tempo vs. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (238 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1985 Ford Tempo. (100 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 785 kg more than 1985 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (359 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Ford Tempo | 2004 Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Tempo | Pathfinder |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 3498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2710 mm |
