1985 Ford Tempo vs. 2006 MG ZR
To start off, 2006 MG ZR is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 MG ZR (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1985 Ford Tempo. (90 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 MG ZR should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Ford Tempo weights approximately 10 kg more than 2006 MG ZR.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 MG ZR. (123 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1985 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 MG ZR.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford Tempo | 2006 MG ZR | |
Make | Ford | MG |
Model | Tempo | ZR |
Year Released | 1985 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2510 mm |