1985 Ford Tempo vs. 2006 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2006 Renault Kangoo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Ford Tempo (100 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2006 Renault Kangoo. (74 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Kangoo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Kangoo. (114 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1985 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford Tempo | 2006 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Tempo | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1985 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 114 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2610 mm |