1985 Ford Tempo vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (290 HP) has 190 more horse power than 1985 Ford Tempo. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 410 kg more than 1985 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Kia Cadenza has automatic transmission and 1985 Ford Tempo has manual transmission. 1985 Ford Tempo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Cadenza will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford Tempo | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Tempo | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 290 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2845 mm |