1985 Ford Tempo vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-09 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-09 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1985 Ford Tempo. (90 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09 should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-09 weights approximately 957 kg more than 1985 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-09 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda CX-09 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Ford Tempo | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Tempo | CX-09 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 86 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 2062 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5108 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1936 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1728 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2875 mm |
