1985 Holden Camira vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1985 Holden Camira. (83 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1985 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 176 kg more than 1985 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Holden Camira. (126 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Holden Camira | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Camira | 3 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1597 cc |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1191 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2650 mm |