1985 Holden Commodore vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1985 Holden Commodore is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,298 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Holden Commodore (115 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Holden Commodore weights approximately 790 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Holden Commodore | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Holden | Lotus |
| Model | Commodore | Elan |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3298 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2240 mm |
