1985 Honda Accord vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Honda Accord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Honda Accord would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Honda Accord (109 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 295 kg more than 1985 Honda Accord.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Honda Accord. (152 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Honda Accord. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 1985 Honda Accord has manual transmission. 1985 Honda Accord will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Honda Accord | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Honda | Mazda |
Model | Accord | CU-X |
Year Released | 1985 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1829 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2680 mm |