1985 Hyundai Pony vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Hyundai Pony. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Hyundai Pony would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP) has 202 more horse power than 1985 Hyundai Pony. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1985 Hyundai Pony. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 640 kg more than 1985 Hyundai Pony. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ATS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Hyundai Pony, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (353 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Hyundai Pony. (96 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Hyundai Pony. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 1985 Hyundai Pony has manual transmission. 1985 Hyundai Pony will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Hyundai Pony | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Hyundai | Cadillac |
Model | Pony | ATS |
Year Released | 1985 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 96 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.5 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2776 mm |