1985 Jaguar XJR vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,500 cc (12 cylinders), 1985 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 528 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (143 HP @ 6750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 200 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1985 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1985 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Jaguar XJR | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Jaguar | Rover |
Model | XJR | 200 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6500 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 671 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2510 mm |