1985 Jaguar XJR vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,500 cc (12 cylinders), 1985 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 574 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (97 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 210 kg more than 1985 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1985 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Jaguar XJR | 2005 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | XJR | Clio |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6500 cc | 1389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 671 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 50 L |
