1985 Jaguar XJR vs. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,500 cc (12 cylinders), 1985 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 403 more horse power than 2009 Land Rover Range Rover. (268 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2009 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1857 kg more than 1985 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Jaguar XJR | 2009 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Jaguar | Land Rover |
Model | XJR | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1985 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6500 cc | 3630 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 671 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 2717 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 105 L |