1985 Jaguar XJR vs. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,500 cc (12 cylinders), 1985 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 489 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Equinox. (182 HP @ 6700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Equinox. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 853 kg more than 1985 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1985 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Jaguar XJR | 2012 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Jaguar | Chevrolet |
Model | XJR | Equinox |
Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6500 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 671 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1713 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2858 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 71 L |