1985 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 164 more horse power than 1985 Jeep Cherokee. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep Cherokee.
Because 1985 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep Cherokee. (278 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep Cherokee. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1985 Jeep Cherokee has manual transmission. 1985 Jeep Cherokee will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Jeep Cherokee | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | Cherokee | Calais |
Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 278 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |