1985 Jeep CJ vs. 1963 Lotus 25
To start off, 1985 Jeep CJ is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus 25 (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus 25 should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 840 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus 25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Jeep CJ | 1963 Lotus 25 | |
| Make | Jeep | Lotus |
| Model | CJ | 25 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 196 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 9500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 456 kg |
