1985 Jeep CJ vs. 1963 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1985 Jeep CJ is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus Elan (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 702 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Jeep CJ (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1985 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Jeep CJ | 1963 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Jeep | Lotus |
| Model | CJ | Elan |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1963 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 138 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 594 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2140 mm |
