1985 Jeep CJ vs. 1969 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1985 Jeep CJ is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Lotus Elan (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 596 kg more than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Jeep CJ (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Lotus Elan. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1985 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Jeep CJ | 1969 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Jeep | Lotus |
Model | CJ | Elan |
Year Released | 1985 | 1969 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2140 mm |