1985 Jeep CJ vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1985 Jeep CJ is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Jeep CJ (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 51 kg more than 1972 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1985 Jeep CJ (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1985 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Jeep CJ | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Jeep | Triumph |
Model | CJ | 2000 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2700 mm |