1985 Jeep CJ vs. 1973 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1985 Jeep CJ is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 336 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1973 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Jeep CJ | 1973 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | CJ | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2480 mm |
