1985 Jeep CJ vs. 1975 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1985 Jeep CJ is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 246 kg more than 1975 Lotus Eclat.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Lotus Eclat. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Jeep CJ | 1975 Lotus Eclat | |
| Make | Jeep | Lotus |
| Model | CJ | Eclat |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1975 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2490 mm |
