1985 Jeep CJ vs. 1976 Zastava 132
To start off, 1985 Jeep CJ is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Zastava 132 (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Zastava 132 should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 201 kg more than 1976 Zastava 132.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Zastava 132. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Jeep CJ (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1985 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Jeep CJ | 1976 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Jeep | Zastava |
| Model | CJ | 132 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2560 mm |
