1985 Jeep CJ vs. 1979 Mazda 626
To start off, 1985 Jeep CJ is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 251 kg more than 1979 Mazda 626.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Mazda 626 has automatic transmission and 1985 Jeep CJ has manual transmission. 1985 Jeep CJ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Mazda 626 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Jeep CJ | 1979 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ | 626 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2520 mm |