1985 Jeep CJ vs. 1979 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 1985 Jeep CJ is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Toyota Mark II (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 96 kg more than 1979 Toyota Mark II.
Let's talk about torque, 1979 Toyota Mark II (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1979 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Jeep CJ | 1979 Toyota Mark II | |
| Make | Jeep | Toyota |
| Model | CJ | Mark II |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2590 mm |
