1985 Jeep CJ vs. 1989 Volvo 240
To start off, 1989 Volvo 240 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Volvo 240 (115 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 6 kg more than 1989 Volvo 240.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Volvo 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Volvo 240 (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1989 Volvo 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Jeep CJ | 1989 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | CJ | 240 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2660 mm |