1985 Jeep CJ vs. 1990 Toyota MR2
To start off, 1990 Toyota MR2 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Toyota MR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Toyota MR2 (135 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 121 kg more than 1990 Toyota MR2.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Toyota MR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Toyota MR2 (196 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1990 Toyota MR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Jeep CJ | 1990 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | CJ | MR2 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1990 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 196 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2610 mm |